Trespass notice (inc shipping)

These metal signs are printed onto a solid aluminium base; We here at Thriving Abundance have used these successfully for many years;
3mm ACP Aluminium Composite Panel, as a full colour print as highlighted below?
Price – $44.97 each + P&H – $25 = $69.97

Why we hear you ask?
Because they work!

As you can see, there is no all UPPER CASE WORDS; this is because words that are written in ALL UPPER CASE are classed as “Dog Latin”, or alternatively, Gobbledygook, & they cannot be read by police, sheriffs, council officers, & or process servers;

We also highlight only the important High Court of Australia cases that speak directly to Trespass; & the most important one being Plenty v Dillon [1991] 171 CLR 635 F.C. 91/004;

You will also note that it says “No Trespass” which signifies that this is in the present; “No Trespassing” signifies that this has occurred in the past, & therefore one cannot be prosecuted for this; Also note that there is no line around the whole Notice, as this would create a box which the Notice is contained within; therefore effectively removing it from the page;

This is why 99.99% of Trespass Notices are ineffective – they simply cannot be read by those that know of these things;

Background:

The English monarch responsible for codifying trespass laws, specifically the Forcible Entry Act, was Richard II, and this occurred in 1381. This Act was part of a broader effort to discourage self-help and encourage resolution of property disputes through civil means, requiring a threatened party to retreat if possible.

The concept of trespass, particularly concerning the inviolability of one’s home, has deep roots in English common law, predating specific codification. The famous dictum “an Englishman’s home is his castle” originates from Semayne’s Case in 1604, which was later elaborated upon by the 17th-century jurist Sir Edward Coke in his The Institutes of the Laws of England (1628). This principle asserts that a person’s home is a place where they have protections and immunities, allowing the use of force, including deadly force, to defend against intruders under certain circumstances, free from legal prosecution.

While the Forcible Entry Act of 1381 under Richard II specifically addressed unlawful entry and the use of force in regaining possession of land, it was more about regulating the method of entry and re-entry rather than a comprehensive codification of all trespass laws as understood today. Earlier legal developments also contributed to the framework of property rights and their protection. For instance, Henry II (reigned 1154–1189) introduced legal reforms, including petty assizes like “novel disseisin,” which allowed for the speedy resolution of land disputes and protected possession against unlawful dispossession. These reforms laid some of the foundational elements of common law related to property and its protection.

The evolution of trespass laws in England is a complex process, stemming from common law principles, judicial precedents, and various statutes over centuries, rather than a single monarch’s comprehensive codification at one specific date. The Forcible Entry Act of 1381 was a significant statutory intervention that aimed to control the use of self-help in property disputes, but it was one piece within a larger, continuously developing legal landscape.